I’m A Nazi, He’s A Nazi, Wouldn’t You Like To Be A Nazi Too?

Posted on October 29th, 2008 in United States Politics by rfburnhertz

Five day’s before this nation was attacked by Islamic terrorists Barack Obama was on Chicago Public Radio comparing America to the Nazis‘.

just to take a, sort of a realist perspective…there’s a lot of change going on outside of the Court, um, that, that judges essentially have to take judicial notice of. I mean you’ve got World War II, you’ve got uh, uh, uh, the doctrines of Nazism, that, that we are fighting against, that start looking uncomfortably similar to what we have going on, back here at home.

Ironically Obama friend William Ayers said the following in a NY Times article (which just so happened to have ran on September, 11th 2001):

I don’t regret setting bombs

I feel we didn’t do enough

It just boggles my frigging mind that there are so many Americans who would actually consider electing this man to lead this nation!

God help us and may our children forgive us if this fool is in fact elected.

I Choose My Friends Carefully; Politically Active Black Students, Foreign Students, The Chicanos, The Marxist Professors And Structural Feminists

Posted on October 29th, 2008 in United States Politics by rfburnhertz

Barack Obama has tried to wring out every last drop he can from that tired rag “McCain equals Bush”.
If we put that same logic to work against Obama then “Obama equals Marx”.

I’ll begin with a quote from Barack Obama’s book “Dreams From My Father”

I’d seen this some months ago but saw it again today while reading an article by Bill Sammon of Fox News and it brought to mind some other issues which assist in demonstrating that at best Barack Obama is a Socialist.

To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism and patriarchy.

[If you do not know who Franz Fanon (actual name was Frantz Fanon) is you can find a quick overview here: Frantz Fanon was a psychiatrist, philosopher, revolutionary, and author from Martinique. He was influential in the field of post-colonial studies and was perhaps the pre-eminent thinker of the 20th century on the issue of decolonization and the psychopathology of colonization. His works have inspired anti-colonial liberation movements for more than four decades.]
He chose his friends carefully, given the description of his friends he clearly sought out the radical fringe and those groups which tended towards Socialist and Marxist ideology.
If Barack did not favor a Socialist/Marxist ideology did he then seek such person out to be his friends?

Barack’s mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA).
Typically a mentor is one who is meant to influence a person in a specific direction in life. A counselor, a teacher.

Campaign workers for Barack Obama displayed a flag featuring communist hero Che Guevara.

I haven’t heard since the first time I saw this image, but I am sure the flag has since been removed per the Obama campaign. Removed or not it demonstrates the type of person Obama attracts and inspires to work for his election.

Marx and Obama have in common a disdain for religion.
Speaking of small town America Obama said the following:

they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations

No less hostility was displayed by Marx when he stated:

Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the sentiment of a heartless world, and the soul of a soulless condition. It is the opium of the people

Or

Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand

Mr. Obama essentially echoed the thoughts of Karl Marx.

Mr. Obama makes claim to Christianity yet words such as this flow with ease from his heart, to his mind and out his mouth.

Perhaps not that surprising when you look closely at the church he attended for 20 years which taught from the pulpit a very Socialist perversion of the Gospel.

Senator Obama has previously worked with ACORN (though he has recently begun to deny any direct involvement with the group) which in the 1980 made a practice of placing squatters in unoccupied homes.

ACORN speaks to this on their website:

ACORN sought to place needy people in the resulting vacant homes. This required the forceful and illegal (though logical and moral) seizing of the properties - squatting.

The squatting campaigns involved personal, community and political dimensions. The personal needs of people without homes attracted many to advertisements ACORN placed in papers asking “Do you need a home?” The squatting campaign required a personal commitment to move into a vacant, usually poorly kept house and refit it for comfortable living. It also involved the risk of arrest if local authorities refused them the legal occupation of the home.

How very Marxist indeed.

Barack Obama was listed as being a member of the Socialist organization known as the New Party.
We all know about Bill Ayers the domestic terrorist and his association with Barack Obama.
Obama makes a regular claim that Ayers was just “Some guy in the neighborhood”.
Seem’s a tad odd that Obama would review and endorse a book for “Some guy in the neighborhood”.

Consider all of the above information to be puzzle pieces.
Each piece may not demonstrate on it’s own that Barack Obama is a Socialist or a Marxist.
But as we put all the pieces together the picture emerges in a very clear manner.

I by no means presented all of the pieces here, but enough were presented to know what the picture will look like when the last piece is added to the puzzle.

Many other blogs have covered this topic in much more depth than I have.
Get your Google on and you will be sure to find scores of articles.

Obama’s America; A Sneak-Peek?

Posted on October 29th, 2008 in Pro-Life, Religion, United States Politics by rfburnhertz

Focus on the Family’s Citizenlink has produced for their Turn Signal a video which theorizes what America might look like in the year 2012 as a result of an Obama presidency.
I fear they might not be to far off target.
In fact, it might be a little optimistic.
I had some issues embedding the video, it works but some of the coding carried over into this post.
You can always go to the Turn Signal link above to view the video on the Citizenlink website.
[dcr http://focusfamaction.edgeboss.net/downl...[/dcr]

More On Spreading The Wealth From Barack Obama

Posted on October 26th, 2008 in United States Politics by rfburnhertz

We all saw the video or heard the audio clip of the brief conversation between Barack Obama and “Joe the plumber”.

Now we go back to 2001 where we hear Obama confirm in a radio interview that he holds solidly to the belief of redistribution and also how best that redistribution can be accomplished.

If some dim-bulb such as myself can simply surf the internet and find this stuff, why can’t the MSM?

Video from Naked Emperor News
UPDATE:Found the text to the above audio at Stop The ACLU

If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court. I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order as long as I could pay for it I’d be o.k. But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts. You know, the institution just isn’t structured that way.

He isn’t optimistic but he sure is working towards that end despite what he has said since Joe the plumber confronted him.

Marxists/Socialists/Communists for Obama

Posted on October 25th, 2008 in United States Politics by rfburnhertz

As I’ve noted I’ll be covering ground that has already been covered.
Nothing like a little reminder from time to time though.

Barack Obama has confirmed to me that he is indeed a socialist of the first order by way of word, action and association.

There are those in America who consider themselves to be Socialist, Communist or Marxist who don’t believe Obama falls into any of those categories.
They do however believe he represents their views close enough that they are willing to back him and give to him their votes.

That fact means something.

My Barack Obama Community Blogs

This group is for self-proclaimed Marxists/Communists/Socialists for the election of Barack Obama to the Presidency. By no means is he a true Marxist, but under Karl Marx’s writings we are to support the party with the best interests of the mobilization of the proletariat. Though the Democratic Socialists of America or the Communist Patty of America may have more Socialististic values, it is pointless to vote for these candidates due to the fact that there is virutally no chance they will be elected on a National level.

It also means something that a blog for self proclaimed “Marxist,Socialists, and Communists” would be allowed on the Obama site  my.barackobama.com is a part of barackobama.com).

One would think that someone who rejects such worldviews would also reject such content and statements being place on their campaign website.

Barack Obama may not be a full on Marxist, but he is damn close and too damn close as to be allowed to be the President of this nation.

That he would even be given such very serious consideration by the American people demonstrates just how very far we have moved from the America created and envisioned by those who founded our nation.

Next Page »